tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6901587667392344560.post1130642202161246062..comments2010-02-27T13:20:41.317-07:00Arihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17740793237376032860noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6901587667392344560.post-79273635617074857052010-02-27T14:18:02.713-07:002010-02-27T14:18:02.713-07:00You think the loving interview she got on FOX constitutes the &quot;rough and tumble of an extemporaneous interview?&quot; Who knows why, but she was completely and unnecesarily vague, and a person should be readily forgiven for interpreting her &quot;too small&quot; comment as a cry for more federal money. I hate to think what she might have said if the FOX interviewer had acted like a real journalist and asked her the tough questions.<br /><br />Still, I like the sentiment of your post. Thanks. Jason SalzmanJason Salzmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06021537483106115194noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6901587667392344560.post-12698212993423172332010-02-27T13:20:41.317-07:002010-02-27T13:20:41.317-07:00What strikes me about the proposal to target temporary suspension of employer contributions to Social Security through payroll taxes is that it is a tacit acknowledgment of the disincentive such taxes put upon hiring. Note to self: that is a point that should be remade more explicitly.Jimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03294929174237823914noreply@blogger.com